Pre-launch — early access list is open

One sentence in. A finished video out.

The premise is simple and it is the whole product: you should never have to become the machine operator. You describe what you want. The system works out how.

Step one

Say what you want, the way you would say it to a person

"Make me a 30-second ad for my product. Futuristic, premium, a bit mysterious, and I want a big reveal at the start." That is a complete instruction. There is no second, more technical version you are supposed to know.

What happens behind that sentence is that the words are converted into a structured creative specification — emotion, energy arc, material language, lighting, colour, camera, editing rhythm, sound. That specification is what the rest of the pipeline works from, which is why a vague-sounding request still produces a specific result.

Step two

It plans before it spends

A brief, then a concept, then a story, then an actual shot list — what each shot contains, how long it runs, what the camera does, who is in it and what must stay identical to the shot before. You approve a cheap preview before anything expensive renders.

This is the step that most tools skip, and it is why they burn credits. Planning is nearly free; generating is not. Getting the structure right on paper first means the expensive part only ever runs on something that already makes sense.

Step three

It checks its own work, then cuts it together

Every result is graded by a separate critic before you see it — anatomy, text, logos, continuity, brand fit, platform fit. Anything that fails is diagnosed and repaired rather than silently retried. Then it is edited: order, timing, transitions, music, captions.

If one shot is wrong, that shot is repaired. The other nine are not regenerated, the character does not change because the lighting did, and the version you liked three revisions ago is still retrievable exactly as it was.

The machine, if you want to see it

Fourteen stages, each independently replaceable

You never have to look at this. It is here because a system that hides how it works is a system you cannot trust, and because every stage below is a real component rather than a diagram drawn after the fact.

Vibe interpreter
Turns what you said into a structured creative specification.
Creative director
Develops several genuinely different directions and scores them against the brief.
Project brain
Remembers everything about this project so nothing has to be re-explained.
World, character and brand lock
Fixes what is not allowed to change: faces, wardrobe, products, logos, palette.
Story engine
Acts, beats, scenes and shots — paced for the platform it is going to.
Shot planner
Every shot gets a full record: duration, subject, action, camera, lens, lighting, continuity requirements.
Reference engine
Assigns each reference image a specific job rather than dumping them all into every generation.
Model router
Picks the best model for each individual task, and the cheap one where cheap is enough.
Generation
The part everyone else calls the whole product.
Visual QA and critic
An independent judge scores technical, creative, brand and platform quality.
Repair loop
Diagnoses why something failed and fixes that cause, instead of rolling the dice again.
Editor and assembler
Order, timing, transitions, music, captions, colour — assembled like a human editor would.
Final QA
One last pass across the whole sequence, not just the individual shots.
Delivery
Finished assets, in every format you need, with the project retained for future edits.

Three ways to work

As much control as you actually want

Vibe mode

Maximum automation

"Make it feel expensive." You give the feeling and the system makes every technical decision. This is the default and most people never leave it.

Director mode

Medium automation

You want control of shots, camera, lighting and timing — but still conversationally, not through a panel of sliders.

Production mode

Maximum visibility

Show me the actual pipeline, the models, the prompts, the references and the settings. Everything the system decided, and why.

Built against the best of the category

What each of these tools is genuinely loved for

Beating a competitor's weaknesses is easy and not very useful if you also fail to match what people actually like about them. These are real strengths of real products, and each one has a matching commitment here.

Product	What it is genuinely loved for	The matching commitment here
OpenArt	Custom model training — upload your own images and train a private model on your exact style, brand or character, with no coding.	The same mechanism powers the character bible and the "transform your photo" feature, rather than a weaker substitute.
Runway	A genuinely polished professional timeline editor, motion brush, and integrations with the tools professionals already use.	The editor agent has to feel this professional, not merely functional. An assembly step that is technically present but unpleasant is not an editor.
Krea	Real-time generation that updates as you type — an instant feedback loop instead of submit-and-wait.	Built into preview mode, so exploring a concept feels alive rather than like queueing.
Higgsfield	Access to a very large roster of premium video models in one place.	That is exactly what the model router is for, and the roster has to be genuinely broad rather than 'several'.
Midjourney	Exceptional artistic image quality and style range, smooth outpainting, character references, multi-image composition.	The bar for pure still-image quality. Character references are the direct ancestor of the character bible.
HeyGen	Genuinely realistic human avatars, dubbing, and multilingual video translation.	Multilingual dubbing is a real, valuable capability worth having, and realistic presenters are already a proven use case here.

Questions

Do I have to understand prompting, models or seeds?

No. That is the design premise. Prompting, model selection, seeds, workflows, camera terminology, image-to-video mechanics, reference conditioning, aspect ratios and negative prompting are all handled internally. You describe the result you want in ordinary language.

What happens if a shot comes out wrong?

It is diagnosed rather than simply retried. The system identifies the specific failure — a character's face drifting, a product distorting, unreadable text — and addresses that cause, then regenerates only the affected shot. The rest of the sequence is untouched.

Can I control the camera and lighting if I want to?

Yes, in director mode. You get control of shot, camera, lighting, lens, character, environment, action, timing, music, colour and transitions — still conversationally rather than through a parameter panel. Production mode goes further and shows you the actual models, prompts, references and settings.

What stops the character changing between shots?

A character bible: a persistent identity record holding face, hair, body, wardrobe, accessories, mannerisms and an explicit list of things that must never change. It is defined once and enforced on every subsequent generation, including in future projects months later.

Join the early access list